Phenomenal 8 years

 It has been a phenomenal 8 years since a man started stalking, social engineering, smearing and dedicating his entire life to trying to hack, harass, and hurt me. The amount of help and support is completely not available when someone starts being puppeted and abused, drugged, used to stalk you by someone clinically insane, and a few other deaths occur as outcomes. Every profile and every service is miraculously incorrect and unhelpful.

  

Lawyers and the $200 consult salami attack

When outnumbered by a group of 10 in a very deliberately paid smear campaign. Each call to an attorney becomes a $200 consult to find another attorney. At some point you stop consulting attorneys' for referral. The ABA is a free resource in theory. Yet because attorney's carry bias, or may specialize in cases counter-productive to your case, it is not going to outline that bias to select the right one.

 

After 10 or so consults, one stops the $200 salami attack on referrals.  

Reasonably helpful by Google: "Failing to perceive that a terrified, isolated person might die constitutes criminal negligence. "

 Source: Google Gemini

1. The Homicide Analysis: Proving Causation and Negligence

To secure a criminally negligent homicide conviction in this specific scenario, the state must prove two critical components:

• The Proximate Cause: The prosecution must prove that the cyberstalking and hacking hoaxes directly caused the medical emergency or psychological break that led to death. For example, if the defendant knew the victim had a severe heart condition, and used a fake hacking scare to purposely induce panic, the scare is legally treated as the weapon.
• Gross Deviation of Care (The Response Facility): If the defendant was present, or had a legal duty of care over the victim, and actively ensured no "adequate response facility" (like a phone, medical alert, or internet connection) was available to call 911, this constitutes a gross deviation from standard human behavior. Failing to perceive that a terrified, isolated person might die constitutes criminal negligence. If they did perceive the risk and ignored it anyway, the charge would likely be upgraded to manslaughter or murder.

2. Digital and Cyber Crimes Committed

Even outside of the death itself, the actions described violate multiple severe state and federal criminal laws:

• Breach of Computer Security (Texas Penal Code § 33.02): Altering, manipulating, or abusing data on someone else's computer without their effective consent is a crime. Depending on the intent to defraud or harm, and the value of the data involved, this can range from a misdemeanor to a first-degree felony.
• Stalking / Cyberstalking (Texas Penal Code § 42.072): Engaging in a repeated course of conduct directed at a specific person—including using electronic communications—that causes them to fear death, bodily injury, or severe emotional distress is a third-degree felony in Texas. It carries a penalty of 2 to 10 years in prison.
• Federal Cyberstalking (18 U.S.C. § 2261A): If the cyberstalking used any interactive computer service (the internet, email, social media) and resulted in the death of a person, the federal penalty escalates drastically to life in prison.

3. Intentional Failure to Provide Aid

If the person who caused the hoax was also responsible for the victim's lack of communication or medical tools, other laws apply:

• Continuous Harassment: If the perpetrator purposefully blocked access to a phone or the internet to prevent the victim from debunking the hoax or calling for help, it elevates the cyberstalking charge and establishes malicious intent.
• Failure to Stop Harm: While Texas generally does not have a "Good Samaritan" law forcing random strangers to save someone, a person cannot actively create a dangerous situation (the terrifying hoax) and then legally walk away while the victim dies from that exact situation. Creating the danger creates a legal duty to act.

Sock Accounts

The only account X Identity and Access Mangement team has left in permanent suspense is the one with the address set up for a SANS DFIR conference 6/2020.

 

Drinal forums would be his focus (with Ryan Tomcik) where Zandalay (Candace Karademir who sold her company to Genpact called "Headstrong Media")....made credible threats to stalk and on my life in 2002 over a game forum political discussion.

 

Amazingly he has stalked many years over this. Not sure why he works in X, yet the stalking with casualty is a major issue. 

E-Mail to Alexis M. Jackson in Sugar Land, TX

I have sent Alexis Jackson an e-mail for discovery yesterday. 

Please respond to the email Alexis as I need to track things with a timeline. I am hiring someone to build out a timeline and report.

Anyway need to know if you agreed to work with Ted Guiterrez or if that was really him or his web dev using apple machine learning. It's a mind trick the guy has been doing since 2018 with monitoring capabilities using several services.

Phone call to Immanuel One Accord

Left Message for Marcell Perry: Who had Jerrell Pugh or Julia set up a Gmail account with Shell corporate security name? 6PM 5/28/26 

 

There will be consequences for lack of response. 

Known Parties

Known Parties:

Roger Russ White

Guy with the car near Roger Grenon's

KKR/KPMG (one I need to find the info on an individual I had mapped, it is buried deeply and requires an LLM and auto tagging and sorting) 

Dustin Wellington Sabel Systems (completely vouched for an impersonation account that appeared to be generated by someone trafficking young women)

Owner of the @cafrozed, @securitybrew, and @hackingbutlegal accounts on X.

 

Probable parties:

Paul Makepeace

Andrew Cooley

Kyle Sipila  (for reasons with Priesmeyer)

Tricia Bryant (Sysco) 

 

Complications 

I have to simply believe my sister when she says it was Jerrell Pugh who set up an email account for her using Shell corporate security names. Especially since she was drugged to call gurgling an gagging while a man made 3,000 media bots for it. 

I am going to be preparing criminal charges with some hired help so the police will not have questions about probable cause next time.